The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep by me. The AfD was prompted by concerns about copyright violation (and the text read like VSCA as well). Wafulz has deleted the copyrighted text. Therefore the reason for nomination is gone. The article that remains is surely keepable in its own right. - Richard Cavell 03:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

someone added this artcle for deletion, but didn't list it here. Gman124 02:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. No reason given for deletion. The article isn't impressive, certainly, but if it's an on-going series from major comic publisher like Marvel and based upon one of Marvel's signature heroes, that would certainly seem to meet notability requirements. Mwelch 02:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Major comic book series. I feel I can can confidently cite precedent here without worry of being contradicted by WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. 23skidoo 02:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. It looks like the AfD was added by this guy because he thought it was a copyvio (see Talk:Spider-Man Family). I've removed the text that is almost certainly a copyvio. Even if it isn't, it's absurdly promotional and would require an entire rewrite. No need to go through this process at this point. --Wafulz 02:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.