The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to lounge music. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 09:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Space Age Bachelor Pad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a genre a neologism made up by one person. Ridernyc (talk) 20:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The two sources given as external links actually indicate it is a neologism and not a genre. Most of the bands listed more immediately fit into obvious genres.--SabreBD (talk) 07:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete can not find significant, independent non-trivial coverage of the musical style by others than the gentleman who coined the term, does not meet WP:GNG. J04n(talk page) 11:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into lounge music. I could easily find significant, independent, nontrivial coverage of the musical style, however the amount of text does not yet justify a separate article. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, the sources disagree whether this is a sub-genre of lounge music (this seems to be the majority opinion) or a neologism for this style. gidonb (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to lounge music; this is just a latter-day synonym that popped up in connection with Combustible Edison and the late '90s lounge fad. — Gwalla | Talk 19:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to lounge music, since that is what it is. Chubbles (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.