The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎ as G7 per author request. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SpaceAble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable space startup with trivial mentions and with no relialbe independent non-trivial media coverage required by WP:NCORP. Taking off shortly (talk) 10:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Astronomy, Spaceflight, and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: hardly any coverage of this company in French media sources. Some interviews with people that work there, but mostly press releases. What's used in the article now isn't helpful either. Oaktree b (talk) 12:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per nom. Svartner (talk) 14:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per lack of WP:SIGCOV in RS. Piscili (talk) 15:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I created this article. I agree that SpaceAble's notability can be questioned. James Tamim (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.