The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Snowflake, the White Gorilla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable to pass WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 02:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 02:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Leaning keep, based on the large number of foreign-language Wiki versions with citations suggesting more extensive coverage in other languages. That, plus the fact that the English-language voice cast collects some fairly big names—Ariana Grande, David Spade, Jennette McCurdy, and Christopher Lloyd—leads me to suspect that this is a notable production. BD2412 T 05:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have added analysis from a just-published scholarly article (the pages can be found in the Amazon.com preview for the referenced book containing the article), which has about 600 words of analysis of the film. BD2412 T 05:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One review of the film given is fine; poor sourcing otherwise. I looked at the Fr wiki article, it uses ImDB and blog-type sites, so nothing there for reviews. It mentions this video won some awards, but I don't think they're notable. It was a Spanish release, perhaps more sources are to be found in that language? Weak Delete until we can confirm if there are other sources. Oaktree b (talk) 14:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Spanish sources are not helpful to achieve notability. BruceThomson (talk) 05:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep as per the significant coverage in the scholarly article identified above, but more reviews in reliable sources would clinch it, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment IMDB has links to 10 secondary reviews with languages including Italian, Spanish and German: [1]. The Guardian features the film cover in a gallery about the Cannes film festival Marché [2] along with the quote "Something just slightly uncomfortable about this one" ResonantDis_tortion 15:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Oaktree b and ResonantDistortion: I have added content from the first secondary review listed at IMDb, from www.cinefilos.it. I don't know if this is considered a particularly high level source (it is used in some existing Wikipedia articles), but it does appear to be a reasonably thorough review. BD2412 T 17:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Tendency to keep. Improvements by @BD2412: adding a scholarly article, a thorough national review, and commentary from a known WP:RS enough to push over WP:NF. ResonantDis_tortion 20:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are more editors advocating Keeping this article but also significant doubts on the part of others about whether additional reliable sources/reviews can be located.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep moving to full keep as the additional references identified in this discussion such as the multiple reviews described by ResonantDistortion as well as the scholarly journal article show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.