The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Courcelles 04:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete. Without any independent sources to show notability, which no one has managed to even hint exists, the article cannot be kept. Consensus among the comments based in policy is clearly for deletion. Courcelles 04:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skullgrin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Character is not notable. Delete NotARealWord (talk) 16:55, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No real sources, no evidence of real-world notability. J Milburn (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Notable character article that just needs work. At the rate these deletionists are nominating articles, how can they expect work to be done on them! Keep and start nominating them at a sane pace. Mathewignash (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you believe it's notable, provide some evidence. If you want to work on the article later, it can be restored to your userspace. J Milburn (talk) 21:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Non-notable fan sources, failure of WP:GNG. Tarc (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into a G1 character article. This character appears in the Japanese continuation of the G1 series. —Farix (t | c) 00:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • When dealing with non-notable character articles, it is always preferable to look for a list or to create one to merge the article into, or merge/redirect them to the main article instead of outright deletion and is in keeping with the WP:PRESERVE policy. Only in cases where the character is completely incidental should it be deleted. —Farix (t | c) 18:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or Merge to a character list. BOZ (talk) 04:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep why? Or merge to which character list? J Milburn (talk) 23:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Notability - I just added a non-primary book source. Mathewignash (talk) 12:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Seems that book is a guide on toys. Unless there was like an entire chapter about Skullgrin as a character, then it doesn't establish notability. NotARealWord (talk) 19:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.