The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Skandaloto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how a small village in a municipality is notable enough to be on Wikipedia. It only has one source, which isn't independent, and it only has one sentence. Doesn't seem to good with notability. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 00:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• keep The village is definitely there, though I can find very little about it in current documents. The word "municipality" is misleading in that an area which is largely rural and only has a few thousand residents all told is hardly a city by any standard; the term probably translates better as "township". There are, btw, some problems here in that the locations given for the other villages in the municipality are implausible. But as a rule we have held towns which we could document at all as notable, and there's definitely documentation for this one. Mangoe (talk) 01:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. See the first bullet point at WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm (talk) 01:22, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. There are sources if you go looking. It just took me a mere five minutes to add the 2011 Bulgarian census data. Is the nomination wrongly based upon the stubby state of the article at the point of nomination? If that's the case, it should be closed speedily. Greenshed (talk) 01:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question How is the Guide Bulgaria website not independent of the village? The nomination seems to be based upon a mistaken premise. Greenshed (talk) 01:44, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep legally defined populated place, easily passes WP:GEOLAND. SportingFlyer T·C 10:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. All populated places are notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.