The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 05:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Siphesihle Ndaba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing more than a PR. Fails WP:NACTOR. Not having multiple lead roles in notable films. Behind the moors (talk) 14:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 14:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 14:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 14:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, she doesn’t meet WP:ACTOR yet.-Xclusivzik (talk) 00:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the article has been supported by a good number of citations. Itcouldbepossible ^{(Talk) (Contributions) (Log)} 06:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree with nominator as a WP:PROMOTIONAL article. Fails WP:NACTOR, majority of references used are non-reliable and looks sponsored/paid content. 2402:3A80:6E0:C49A:E0A6:F47B:6B53:4A8 (talk) 09:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.