The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Spec Sharp. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sing Sharp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A moderately cited academic project/paper (~250 GS cites). Might be worth merging to Spec Sharp as an off-shoot/variant, but I don't think it's wp:notable enough by itself. Someone not using his real name (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a merge into Spec Sharp seems sensible! Snori (talk) 02:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.