The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Priest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNews of substance. Fails WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMIC. ttonyb (talk) 06:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMIC. could not find significant coverage of this individual. [1]. LibStar (talk) 06:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. On the face of it, the article appears to be more worthy of keeping than the glib assertions that it failed to meet policies without really saying how it did not meet those policies. However, what really tips the balance for me is the fact that the article is pretty much entirely based upon original research, as acknowledged by the article's creator. For that reason, without there being any other independent, reliable, and verifiable sources, I cannot see how this person is notable.Agent 86 (talk) 13:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.