The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 02:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SigmaQuest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 19:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I cannot find any reliable sources about this company; no evidence of notability. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 19:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Unreferenced article about a Product Performance Intelligence (PPI) company.... SigmaQuest uses the On-demand model of software delivery also known as Software as a service. Christ deliver us. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No RS found for WP:N. --Tgeairn (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.