The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:50, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shiulibari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 12:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - quiet notable. before nominating please see WP:BEFORE Thanks Jethwarp (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - mentioned in scholarly sources. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep this brand new decent stub that is now sourced and further sourcable. Seems a bit problematic to send an improvable topic to AFD within hours of its creation. We are self-admittedly imperfect and a work in progress after all. Let its author continue in good faith and revisit later. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:15, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.