The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The references provided in the article back up the claim he's an elected member of NAS and has won a prize for his work (notable per WP:ACADEMIC) Mgm|^(talk) 12:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shinya Inoué (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Biophysicist. Negligible assertion of notability and no evidence of it. Sgroupace (talk) 00:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, [1] [2] establish notability per WP:GNG. The Nordic Goddess Kristen ^{Worship her} 00:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. In earnest? Not a very considered nomination. Look a little deeper and withdraw the nom. MURGH ^disc. 02:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Very Strong Keep: per this Google News search, this Google Scholar search, this book, this book, these four books,this article,this article, and this article. Schuym1 (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Membership in the United States National Academy of Sciences is easily checkable and a claim of notability that is invariably decisive.John Z (talk) 03:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —John Z (talk) 04:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep and admonish the nominator to understand better what passes for an assertion of notability among academics before being so free with the {{nn-bio}} tag. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. Member of the NAS... This is a joke, right? Lot's of snow to shovel today.... --Crusio (talk) 08:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.