Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Schaffer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 05:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Scott Schaffer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. WP:BLP of a single market local television anchor with a few bit part roles of the "journalist plays a journalist in one short scene" variety in TV shows, sourced only to his staff profile on the website of the television station where he works with no evidence of reliable source coverage and no valid claim to passing WP:JOURNALIST shown at all. As always, every local television anchor does not automatically get a Wikipedia article just because he exists; he must be reliably sourced as more notable than the norm before he qualifies. Bearcat (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable local news anchor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete nope, being a local news guy with no real other evidence of notability doesn't get you included here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.