The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology Justice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (Old AfD) (View log)

This article was nominated for deletion on 31/7/2006. The result of the discussion was keep

No sources apart from the Church itself. Will ^(talk) 21:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Article is based on both cofs and other sources. --Fahrenheit451 21:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Although I have a major problem with the massive amounts of unsourced and contentious information that anti-Scientology editors seek to stuff this article with, this is a real subject, and a valid one for an article. Much of the info regarding this is closely related to Scientology ethics, though, and in the future perhaps a merge is possible if no properly sourced information is forthcoming. wikipediatrix 21:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per Wikipediatrix. I removed a bunch of the unsourced and OR-ish stuff likely put there by someone that was at the receiving end of the subject and is/was upset about it (I did not look at the edit history, only the tone of the material). OK, but Wikipedia is not the place to vent. --Justanother 22:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep The nomination doesn't list any reason for deleting the article. (If there is a properly formed nomination, I'd have to say that the article badly needs specific references rather than the generalized primary source HCOPLs.) Shall I pencil in 7/31 or 8/1 for next year? AndroidCat 23:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC) Sorry, just noticed that "Will" is actually Spectre. (Grumble grumble. I think that sort of name game is a Really Bad Idea.) AndroidCat 01:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, we'll have to use some of their sources to describe their ideas. Anynobody 09:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.