The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Satoshi Kizu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

An article on a Japanese photographer whose "own style of photographing women [...] is characterized by the contrast of light and shade in natural light and the ability to capture on film the natural movements of women, especially those with large breasts"; and of course there's nothing wrong with that, but his remarkable mammary techniques seem to have gone unremarked in those sections of the Japanese photographic world with which I am familiar. This despite his having published (we're told) such books as Madonna-mate Juicy Jelly and Mini Dachshund, which do sound titillating, or at least wobbly. For five months, this article has started "This article does not cite any references or sources." And it still cites no references or sources. Enough. -- Hoary (talk) 15:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 15:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 15:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 15:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, seems hoaxy. Stifle (talk) 17:00, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no notability shown. --Crusio (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because non-notable. The single source given is a porn site. I believe this guy exists, and is associated with Yulia Nova, the Russian big-bust performer, but I don't see his notability. --Lockley (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no hint of independent coverage (and no, I'm not talking about the mammaries). Gwen Gale (talk) 23:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Goodbye, and thanks for the mammaries. I'll get my coat Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 07:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per above. Tatarian (talk) 02:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.