The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Greyhawk. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:40, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sasserine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not establish notability independent of Greyhawk through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Greyhawk. Not independently notable and more suited by Wikia. I don't see how a well-sourced article could be written on this topic without resorting entirely to in-universe writing from primary sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• transwiki to some fanboy site that loves this type of trivia. as for wikipedia, the subject fails WP:GNG and so should be deleted or if there is appropriate content and an appropriate target, merge. however, there being so little content that is sourced, merging bad content to create another bad article is not really helpful to the project. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge to The Shackled City Adventure Path. BOZ (talk) 14:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge. Not really appropriate for a separate article, but the information should be retained and a redirect made. There's no reason given against merging or redirection. Notability is not required for content, just for a separate article. DGG ( talk ) 23:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.