The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 16:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samaira Sandhu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this promotional biography does not meet the "significant coverage" criteria as described in WP:BIO. Only acting role is in a movie that was released two days ago. References are brief puff pieces. Deli nk (talk) 20:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete one film role is not enough to make an actress notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can't judge her notability only from a film, She is a notable writer and model apart from an actress, I think all these points are enough to keep this article live on Wikipedia. You must check deeply the references before put your thoughts.Wikibaji (talk) 05:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How can you "check deeply the references" when they are so shallow? Deli nk (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you check all the four resources available on article are from trust-able websites, books or magazines. Never demoralize of anyone's work on Wikipedia. Think before adding any deletion tag on any article.Wikibaji (talk) 12:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting that I didn't think before adding the deletion tag is nonsense (did you even think before writing that?). I read the article, tried to find additional references, and only then, once it was clear that this article does not meet notability criteria, did I nominate it for deletion. Deli nk (talk) 21:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:UPANDCOMING. Her only notable act is acting in a just-released film. The whole point of discussions here is to challenge notability; demoralization is in the eye of the fan. Wikipedia is not a free webhost for actors. Bearian (talk) 14:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikibaji, the article creator, has directed me here from my talk page. Unfortunately, after looking at the sources, I'll say this article needs to be deleted. Maybe later, Samaira will qualify for an article, but not yet.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think Mrs. East Asia Erath and Mrs. Erath Photogenic can be consider for notability.Wikibaji (talk) 09:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.