The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ✗plicit 12:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SQL compliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely-outdated tech cruft (WP:NOTGUIDE) with no secondary sources. See also other "Comparison of foo" AfDs I started today, as the problems are similar. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 04:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is like Comparison of databases but with way more detail than anyone needs. 3mi1y (talk) 09:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Why did you state that no one needs this? It was a super useful comparison that helps a lot while deciding which database to use in a project, for example. I'm really looking forward to bringing it back. Codenice (talk) 21:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.