The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SEParation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUMS. Couldn't find anything in a Google News search. Bbb23 (talk) 23:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No need for track-listing-only articles. This one serves only to justify abuse of a fair-use image in the infobox.—Kww(talk) 11:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 06:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - the band is of borderline notability at best and this article is just a tracklisting. Fails WP:NALBUMS as stated in the nomination. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 12:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.