The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rotherham Phoenix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable rugby club, nothing showing up on a source that would establish notability outside of their own website Dexxtrall (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails GNG and WP:RU/N#Clubs. There's a few passing mentions, but not enough for a GNG pass. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.