The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rosemary Thomas (diplomat) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources here are primary and therefore weak. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Wikipedia:Notability (politics) proposes that diplomatic notability should be a person who has "received significant coverage in crafting an international agreement or related to a notable diplomatic event. Uhooep (talk) 10:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Bilateral relations, Belarus, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 14:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per LibStar; the article has no WP:SIGCOV and does not meet WP:BIO. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.