Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roksana Ciurysek-Gedir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:52, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Roksana Ciurysek-Gedir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Connorcp (creator) with the following rationale "(sourced additional content)". While new sources are always good, I am afraid they fail to address my concerns. This article is still based primarily on two interviews, and few mentions in passing/press releases/resumes/self-published sources. I don't think the subject is notable as an artist, or a businessperson. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —AE (talkcontributions) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —AE (talkcontributions) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. —AE (talkcontributions) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. —AE (talkcontributions) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —AE (talkcontributions) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —AE (talkcontributions) 11:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No highest-level positions in banking; no major exhibitions or works in museums as artists\ " someone interesting to read about with her career in both finance and arts." is meaningless unless at least one of the careers are notable . There are some interviews , none of which are usable as a RS for anything, since she says whatever she cases to. All that Forbes reference shows is that she has a Press Agent. DGG ( talk ) 16:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 01:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.