The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Resmi R Nair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clickbait and incidental coverage are not a basis to maintain a BLP, and she doesn't have any achievements to be a notable, Fails WP:GNG Padavalam🌂  ►  11:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete appears to be BLP1E without any long term notability. Vikram Vincent 14:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete: A non notable glamour model who fails WP:GNG Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 15:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• DeleteDoesn't have enough sources for now to meet the notability criteria. Sliekid (talk) 16:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not even close to being a notable activist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There are not enough sources which can make him pass WP:GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable Devokewater 10:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.