Red T (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for sources yielded nothing in depth to meet WP:ORG. The 2 sources provided are primary. LibStar (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and New York. LibStar (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:48, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. All I could find were interviews, primary sources and passing mentions. I also looked at whether its founder might be notable as a possible move/redirect option, but I don't think there's enough about her to pass WP:GNG. MCE89 (talk) 03:54, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- (moderate) -- 8 years is more than enough time for an article to be expanded. It's clear from a quick search that this entity does not meet notability standards. The sources there are -- apart from the two primary sources cited currently -- appear to be enetering into Woozle territory, with organizations vouching for one another. Certainly no SIGCOV. MWFwiki (talk) 04:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]