The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Red Elk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article appears to be a non-notable New Age practitioner. The article itself appears solely promotional in nature; does not establish the notability of subject in any way and appears to be supported in terms of references only by self published websites and a single interview in a now defunct online arts magazine. Deconstructhis (talk) 16:31, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete self promotion, not to be confused with the very notable Black Elk. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as self-promotion of an entirely non-notable person. Autumnalmonk (talk) 00:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE-non notable self promotion. Heiro 03:29, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.