The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RK Tacklers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If WP:A7 were to ever apply to a sports team, then this would be the perfect candidate. According to WP:NTEAM, clubs are meant to meet WP:GNG but I can find no evidence that RK Tacklers meets this. Even Danish searches have come back with nothing useful. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 01:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby union and Denmark. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 01:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Left guide (talk) 06:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I would have even used PROD for this one. --Broc (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG, no suitable redirect here either per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.