The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quark XML Author (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Non-notable software per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 07:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 08:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 08:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 08:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 08:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete One of a vast slew of XML tools around this time. Neither market share nor technical innovation would confer notability. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:03, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with the nominator's rationale. A really paranoid android (talk) 16:37, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable text editor. Kraose (talk) 16:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.