The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was : Deleted. Could be a joke article; instead, I suspect some kind of fictional creature (with absolutely no context on from where). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quaizer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional lizard which falls under the jurisdiction of WP:MADEUP. The word has several meanings in different languages, but none of them relate to the content of this article. The creator of the article is presumably the same individual who made this drawing - [1]. Claritas § 21:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Whatever this is, it certainly isn't sourced. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:01, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Reyk _YO! 01:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a borderline hoax. A simple Google search for quaizer lizard results in less than 30 hits, none of which use the two words in the same context. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:09, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.