Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Tate
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Archie Comics characters. (non-admin closure) — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 10:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pop Tate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Blatant violation of WP:N and WP:V, does not meet WP:GNG and is a plot summary thus also violates WP:IINFO obviously. No-where to merge. CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 08:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment What's wrong with merging to List of Archie Comics characters? --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Took the words right out of my mouth, Colapeninsula. I was just going to say that so far I'm not seeing individual notability for Pop Tate, but that he's very much notable enough to be mentioned on the list for Archie characters. We can merge over the basics from this article (keeping it from being an overly long section) and use this as a redirect.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment *facepalms self* there's nothing wrong with it.... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 10:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Colapeninsula CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 10:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to LoC for its stubby plottyness (WP:AVOIDSPLIT, WP:NOT#PLOT). – sgeureka t•c 06:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.