Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physics (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Unproductive and not funny. Please use userspace rather than actual encyclopedia processes for attempts at humor. See WP:AN#April Fools nominations getting out of hand. Sandstein 18:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Articles for deletion/Physics
- Articles for deletion/PhysicsCorp
- Articles for deletion/PhysicsFS
- Articles for deletion/PhysicsOverflow
- Articles for deletion/Physics (2nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Physics (3nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Physics Essays
- Articles for deletion/Physics Essays (2nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Physics Plot
- Articles for deletion/Physics Post - WYU
- Articles for deletion/Physics Wallah
- Articles for deletion/Physics and Astronomy Students' Union
- Articles for deletion/Physics and Star Trek
- Articles for deletion/Physics and Star Trek (2nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Physics and Star Wars
- Articles for deletion/Physics and Star Wars (2nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Physics education in the United Kingdom
- Articles for deletion/Physics envy
- Articles for deletion/Physics envy (2nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Physics equations
- Articles for deletion/Physics major
- Articles for deletion/Physics misconceptions
- Articles for deletion/Physics of Life Reviews
- Articles for deletion/Physics of mighty beans
- Articles for deletion/Physics of the Impossible
- Articles for deletion/Physics of the Metroid Series
- Articles for deletion/Physics ping pong
- Articles for deletion/Physicsforums.com
- Physics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
pseudoscientific nonsense which can't be tested or observed outside of its framework and therefore is non-notable per WP:FRINGE. - filelakeshoe 15:58, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD can only be characterized as a user being disruptive. IRWolfie- (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- O RLY? postdlf (talk) 16:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I did not think April fools jokes would take the form of AfD nominations or additions in article space. IRWolfie- (talk) 16:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- O RLY? postdlf (talk) 16:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a science directory, or redirect to Physical (Olivia Newton-John song). postdlf (talk) 16:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Conservapedia - stop liberal pseudo-science! SPat talk 16:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Supposed WP:RS reviewed exclusively by supporters of fringe topic. Circular references to other fringe authors. They even set up fake awards.Coffeepusher (talk) 16:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 1. Snotbot t • c » 16:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.