Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peshawar Nights

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 21:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peshawar Nights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent, thorough coverage found in WP:BEFORE. Searching in English only found Wikishia and similar sites, as well as translations of the book itself, but no third-party commentary in WP:RS. Farsi and Urdu searches produced similar results. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 17:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 17:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 17:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 17:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (as nom): Faizhaider has made several edits to the article over the past few hours, saying that they are expanding it; however, with all due respect, I feel that most of the content added is WP:REFBOMBing, given that all of the new "sources" appear to be translations of the book itself published by an SPS service, and come nowhere close to contributing to WP:GNG. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 22:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the book has been cited or mentioned by later books like,
--Fztcs 08:58, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I don't think notability would be problem. But lot of pre internet technology print sources from vernaculars are still not online and many not in searchable format and unlikely to get updated soon.
IMHO better option would be to have an article on shia-sunni dialogues and merge the content in separate section there. Once get more content it can be brought back to article with ease. Bookku (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.