Paul Hayes (radio presenter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. None of the sources are independent, and I found no reliable sources online. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United Kingdom. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RadioToday is independent, as are the non-tabloid news websites cited. Companies employing Hayes aren't "dependent" on Hayes and so, in a way, are independent.

Jw93d59 (talk) 16:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jw93d59 please read Wikipedia:Independent sources. Sources from places he's worked are not independent. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll delete Paul Hayes (radio presenter) now.

Jw93d59 (talk) 09:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok turns out I can delete it. It's clearly not good enough so I think it will be

Jw93d59 (talk) 09:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: While some of the sources are associated with the subject, others are not. In view of coverage in the article and elsewhere, he meets basic criteria for notability.--Ipigott (talk) 15:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: For the same reasons as Ipigott. Rillington (talk) 12:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SK2242 (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]