The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Papen County (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional county from a tv show. all the 'refs' would seem to be to episodes. Hurry, before someone starts wikilinking all the stuff in bold and creating new non-articles on things such as the Papen Harbor Lighthouse. Jack Merridew 04:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this article has been transwiki'd to wikia.com; http://annex.wikia.com/wiki/Papen_County —Jack Merridew 07:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as per tag already on the page. Reasonable search term. Nature of the merge can be discussed on the talk page as outlined in the tag. No need for a deletion discussion to handle a merge. --Jayron32 04:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  I saw the tag, but don't see anything worth merging. I'd be fine with a redirect post-delete, assuming there's not a better claim to the name. Cheers, Jack Merridew 04:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Deleting before redirecting is just rude. - BalthCat (talk) 19:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  I'd be fine with omitting the redirect, too. If a term is significant in whatever target, proper searching will find it. fwiw, I believe we've tons of inappropriate redirects about. Cheers, Jack Merridew 23:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  A used redirect is an appropriate redirect. Got any stats? - BalthCat (talk) 05:41, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Not really. I was referring to the appropriateness of targets. See Beumer and what it was until a few days ago, for example. Cheers, Jack Merridew 07:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  That's perfectly appropriate if you aren't aware of the other uses. Poor, sure, but appropriate. - BalthCat (talk) 20:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge as creator. — the Man in Question (in question) 05:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Pushing Daisies per nom. it has no inherit notability outside of being in a TV series. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 06:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  nb: I didn't advocate a merge. In a subsequent comment I specifically said I don't see anything worth merging. Cheers, Jack Merridew 23:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No sources have been provided other than episodes of the television series itself. No out-of-universe perspective is included in this article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect to series article. No sources could be found for this topic outside of the series itself... Shooterwalker (talk) 17:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.