The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per references added. RL0919 (talk) 08:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Wible (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

apparent promotional article. No clear evidence of notability. Her books are self-published. DGG ( talk ) 05:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:41, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:41, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:41, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Passes GNG. I cleaned up the article a little and added the many references about her and her work. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The references provided indicate that she has received sustained and widespread coverage for her work. Mccapra (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.