The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 04:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oasis Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This shows little to no notability for the record label. It was deleted in June 2007 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oasis Entertainment. All the references here appear to be press releases, which cannot be used to established notability. The only two source that appears to be a non-press release is the Coffee Talk article, but that doesn't appear to proivde a lot of notability. Metros (talk) 12:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Related: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User:ArborBooks. --Dhartung | Talk 19:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Maxim_(talk) 14:12, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I can't find any reliable sources for this article and see WP:COI issues.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 16:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per G4, recreation of deleted material. "New" references appear to be self-written press releases, so content is not significantly different to deleted version. Fritzpoll (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.