The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oakland United FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Club has not played in the national cup and is not in a WP:FPL, thus fails WP:FOOTYN. Club has not garnered significant coverage to meet requirements of WP:N. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 16:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 16:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 16:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 16:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I still believe that playing in the 4th tier of US soccer is notable, but the community disagrees, and so I have to go with that. No evidence this club meets GNG either. GiantSnowman 18:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG 73.138.114.150 (talk) 23:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not pass WP:GNG. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 13:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. There are three related AfDs peding. It may make sense to relist or consolidate them in order to ensure a more consistent treatment. The others are: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC Ann Arbor and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Rapids FC. Cbl62 (talk) 15:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Each article is different. There are extensive arguments made on the other two pages to keep. Leave separate. Nfitz (talk) 06:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.