The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia Lumia 1320 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of detail and no references at all 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 19:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Lumia series. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 20:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I think this should be kept but a notice should be added to the page saying it needs more detail. A picture of the product could be added, as well as details, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikejones1477 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and tag as a stub. The device has just been announced, details and refs will probably be coming shortly. Indrek (talk) 21:05, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - It is just announced today, so it should get populated soon. -Abhishikt (talk) 00:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep no good reason to delete. Should not have been nominated. --Danrok (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• CommentWhy is this a good page to keep - it might be a good page later when there is detail to add but putting up a page when there were no details, no references etc? Shouldn't it at the very least be moved to a draft page?-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 17:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's explained on this page: Reasons for deletion. As far as sources go, the article should only be up for deletion if it cannot be correctly sourced at all. In this case, a quick internet search would reveal that there are enough possible sources for this phone (currently 1430 news results on Google). --Danrok (talk) 00:48, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep We've been making pages for each phone on the Lumia line. No need to delete. --Lprd2007 (talk) 04:20, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep future major device. -- Nezdek (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.