The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The issue of renaming/repurposing can be discussed on the article's talk page. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nexcite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Real product, possibly popular, not notable. There is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 02:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Per [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], and [8]. SL93 (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per SL93 above. Note though that some of those references are about the company, and at least one is a copy of a press release from the company. There does appear to be RS establishing it as notable. Preferred outcome would be redirect to company per WP:Product. --Tgeairn (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The company is also named Nexcite so the page could simply be repurposed as a company page. That seems reasonable. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 03:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.