The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus that GEOLAND is satisfied (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 22:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nayatol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources in the article beyond Wikivillage, no indication of notability, and a search reveals no sources that could be used to expand the article. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:04, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 01:55, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Legally designated populated place per WP:GEOLAND and the Indian census [1], needs cleanup, not deletion. SportingFlyer talk 06:17, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep GEOLAND. SpinningSpark 16:58, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It is a place. scope_creep (talk) 19:11, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep — Per the very first criterion of WP:GEOLAND, in that, Nayatol is legally recognised and populated village. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 13:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC); edited 13:49, 23 October 2018 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.