The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was REDIRECT. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 03:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Navin Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable miscellanea ("art project") not covered by A7. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 18:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Navin Rawanchaikul, the conceiver of this "invented political caucus". I withdraw my proposal to merge since this art project differs from the political party The NY Times article mentions. Goodvac (talk) 23:07, 28 May 2011 (UTC) modified 18:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources. The NY Times link above doesn't work for me, but even if it is a good source, it's only one; and the proposal to 'merge' is not very helpful without saying where, exactly, this content should be merged to. Robofish (talk) 15:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Goodvac.--v/r - TP 02:45, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.