The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Robert Mason (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not quite a speedy deletion and already tagged for BLP Prod. He has only played for an amateur side and a claimed two appearances for the national youth teams so doesn't meet notability for rugby union. Given he's retired through injury his notability won't increase (i.e., no chance of ever playing for a full professional team or the main national side). QU ^TalkQu 11:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per reasons given above. I'm a bit confused though: the BLP Prod would have expired today and it hadn't been contested. So why nominate it for deletion through afd now? -- role^player 16:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that's just my misunderstanding, if so I apologise. A BLP Prod would lead to a "preventative" deletion with no restriction on recreating the article. I felt that even with a reference the individual was unnotable and therefore worth a proper discussion on its suitability for inclusion QU ^TalkQu 18:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom. SarahStierch (talk) 17:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per above. AIRcorn (talk) 22:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.