Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Musa
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. North America1000 00:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Muslim Musa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This cricketer has not played any First Class / List A / Twenty20 cricket. He is thus non notable. Fenopy (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason stated for the above article:
- Zia-ur-Rehman (cricketer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Saeed Sarkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Mohammad Saddam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Rifat Pradhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Imran Rafiq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Mosabbek Hossain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Shahanur Rahman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Fenopy (talk) 15:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 16:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. The-Pope (talk) 16:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all They all fail WP:NCRIC, and none of them have any non-routine coverage about them, just stats pages. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. All fails WP:CRIN, and each article erroneously makes the claim they are first-class cricketers, which is a level none have played at. PinchHittingLeggy (talk) 23:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Fail WP:CRIN per reasons above. No indication any have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources therefore failing WP:GNG. Hack (talk) 03:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. They fail WP:CRIN. Jack | talk page 04:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete None of them have played a first-class/List A match, and is they currently stand, they fail WP:NCRIC. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:48, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. Per WP:CRIN. Johnlp (talk) 11:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Snowball close. WP:CRIN does not allow for notability of youth internationals probably because in cricket, a large number of youth internationals do not go on to play senior cricket for notable teams. --Dweller (talk) 13:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. The author has said on WT:CRIC that he created the articles on the basis of participation in the 2015 India Under-19 Tri-Nation tournament. I do not know if this tournament meets official List A criteria, but I assume it does not. If it is List A, then the players meet WP:CRIN. We need verification that the tournament is or os not List A. Jack | talk page 16:17, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- They're list as Youth ODIs on Cricinfo if that helps. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 20:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all, Under-19 internationals are not considered List A, but irrespective, Google searches reveal no non-trivial coverage. They may well go on to have notable careers, but at the moment they don't meet our notability requirements. Harrias talk 08:38, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all, and snow close, per above. IgnorantArmies (talk) 13:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. All of them failWP:CRIN.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.