The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Sajjad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person not-notable, amateur snooker players are generally not-notable and this one has never won a major title. Becoming runner-up at the world amateur is a start, but doesn't meet WP:GNG Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Cue sports. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Soft delete Not a Notable Person fail WP:GNG. Lionfox0909 (talk) 16:36, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lionfox0909, can you explain to me when Soft Deletion is possible? This is a decision that has to be made by the AFD closer, not the participants. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well per [1] the statement which makes more sense in this case is ‘’’soft deletion should be used whenever an article is in a state that does not merit inclusion’’’ as I feel only [2] this is an RS that is why I wrote it as a soft delete 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lots of matches for "Muhammad Sajjad" snooker can be found in the Wikipedia Library, but looking through the first page of results, the level of coverage in not enough to argue that the subject meets GNG. Please ping me if good sources are identified. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.