The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 01:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mounia Bennani-Chraïbi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fail WP:PROF, just a normal academic and doesn't meet criteria and no reliable sources about her. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 02:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep for WP:Prof#C1 on basis of GS record. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep. I added four books (two of them edited) with five published reviews to the article. I think that, together with the citations noted by X, is enough for notability via some combination of WP:PROF#C1 and WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:PROF#C1 and WP:AUTHOR per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the added contributions and above - Astrophobe (talk) 08:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep as passing NAUTHOR given reviews. She also appears to be widely quoted in national French media on political issues.--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉]) 12:30, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep over 1200 google scholar citations https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JK9DDoYAAAAJ&hl=en Lainx (talk) 12:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1200 citations is no sufficient condition. I'm not saying it should be deleted, but simply saying 1200 citations implies that every person with 1200 citations should get a page (and I'm pretty sure most shouldn't). thisbugisonfire (talk) 12:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is passing borderline, particularly with so few coauthors. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.