The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan Woolard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article as is is a run of the mill article on a beauty pageant winner with no substance, and no deep reliable sources. A google news search does actually turn up a whole lot of reliable sources, but they are all razor sharp focused on her response to a question at the Miss USA pageant. The function and roles of these questions and the controversy they are clearly meant to engender, and why they appear at Miss USA but not apparently at Miss America, is worthy of consideration in articles, at least if reliable secondary source inquiry can be found. If not, it is a good subject for scholarly reasearch for some up and coming scholars. However none of that makes the individuals put in tight places and forced to take public stands on highly contentious issues with no time to prepare notable indepedent of the pageant itself. On another note this article was deleted before but that was back in 2007 when her highest claim to fame was being Miss Oklahoma Teen USA. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:12, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Concur with nom. Winning of a state level pageant is not sufficient to establish notability. There is no other claim to notability. MB 20:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Two links are dead. This leaves a primary source to Miss Oklahoma USA and a Fox news report, about her Immigration Response, during the Miss USA 2010 pageant where she placed as 1st runner up. This is not enough to push the threshold of notability for article inclusion. The subject is already named in the other articles so no redirect is needed. Otr500 (talk) 03:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 12:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- insufficient sources to build an article. WP:WHYN applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not actually independently notable outside those pageant events therefore there's nothing else to actually signify importance aside from simply participating. SwisterTwister talk 03:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.