The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:06, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moani Hara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sole clear claim to any notability I can find is a bit part in the 2017 film “Snatched”. I can’t find any BLP compliant sources to verify that, and without them, we should not have an article per WP:BLPDELETE. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing in the article to show notability. She is said to be a model. What kind of model? Has she she been used for a notable advertising campaign? Has she been painted by a famous artist? Does her photo appear on billboards in every North American and European country plus Australia,New Zealand,South Africa and India?Spinney Hill (talk) 10:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC) I have in fact removed two items of no importance whatsoever,thereby improving the article but making it look even thinner.Spinney Hill (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete: per WP:A7 Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 19:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On what grounds? The whole premise of the AfD as stated above is to judge consensus for "delete" or "redirect". Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nothing here is even close to showing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. She won Miss Hawaii USA 2014 (October 2013) and there is some later coverage arising from her being a correspondent for a local TV station as well as continuing to work as a model (August 2019). I will improve the article later today but I may not be able to figure out how to recast the infobox to emphasize the pageant win. I see the beauty pageant project's notability guidelines have been marked as inactive, but it appears a state-level Miss USA win would not clear that bar in any case; however, someone who knows the local news landscape may well be able to find more than I have in order to qualify her under WP:GNG. Could someone add this discussion to the list at the Beauty Pageants WikiProject, please? And pinging the article creator, MandiRodriguez7, who may have such knowledge, although I'm puzzled she didn't include this main claim to notability in the article. On balance I'm taking the continuing coverage as evidence that she does squeak by on GNG. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete : Does not qualify for GNG. ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 10:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.