The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" does not make an intelligible argument. Sandstein 06:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Ehrmantraut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely plot, no real-world information. -- Alex^TW 13:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 March 30. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:58, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep reason given on Kim Wexler's discussion. The Optimistic One (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Lacks notability for a stand-alone article. It is an article that appears to be a biography, that includes the image in the infobox of the real-world actor Jonathan Banks. "IF" it were notable it should be listed as Mike Ehrmantraut (fictional character). Otr500 (talk) 06:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.