The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Underwood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a problematic article. Firstly, the actor subject (now retired) fails WP:NACTOR as their only notable role was Zoey 101. Second, the primary sourcing at this article is tabloid-fodder scandal, and we don't leave articles on Wikipedia that primarily serve as a virtual Attack page on its subject. This article needs to be deleted (to purge the problematic page history) – after deletion, it can then be replaced by a redirect to Zoey 101. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per IJBall's rationale. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.