The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mason Capwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has a lot of problems. Recently, I have removed Youtube clips of the cancelled show Santa Barbara because they are copyright material that are uploaded for entertainment purposes only. Currently, the whole article is unreferenced and absent from notability establishment. Well, to be honest, I did not know that one television series makes this character notable enough; as the article itself, even just one series is not enough for the article to stand on its own. The good article for a fictional character should not be just fictional background, doesn't it? Otherwise, am I wrong about a "good article for a fictional character"? The current media does not mention this character; therefore, the past publications should exist. To make this article kept, we must rely on reliable sources that is not Youtube; otherwise, it is possible to either delete or redirect to another article, --Gh87 (talk) 22:22, 12 October 2011 (UTC) such as List of Santa Barbara cast and characters. --Gh87 (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC) this article deserves a deletion. --Gh87 (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete in its current state because WP:PLOT WP:PLOT WP:PLOT... Nothing there to keep a separate article around, and nothing to merge. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. WP:PLOT is not a valid reason for deletion. You can find more about our deletion policy here. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 14:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: There is no evidence that the fictional character meets the general notability guideline. Also, with no reception or significance for the fictional character, any article about him can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work, which makes it unsuitable for Wikipedia and falls into reasons for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 06:06, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.