Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maropost (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete by Ponyo as a CSD. TarnishedPathtalk 05:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maropost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Third nomination, sources haven't improved much from the second: Bloomberg and Entrepreneur were already analyzed back then, Power Retail is explicitly from a press release (PR Newswire) and Forbes is from a "former contributor". Still no good RS other than Bloomberg, not enough to establish WP:NCORP. ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 19:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Advertising, Companies, India, Sweden, Australia, Canada, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment as author. Notable company as per WP:GNG & WP:NCORP. Company demonstrate notability by significant secondary coverage in independent reliable sources. I would like other editors to review resources before making any comments or judgement.Lifeiswhatnow (talk) 12:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)strike sock-- Ponyobons mots 17:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)- I've CSDed the article - G4, G11 and G5 all apply somewhat, but not completely, so WP:IAR it is. UPE socks shouldn't be able to twist our policies and guidelines to collect their paychecks.-- Ponyobons mots 17:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.